Flesh Mesh X-Ray in Photoshop Flesh Mesh X Ray in Photoshop Image has a score of 60 Image has been viewed 143166 times Image is a favourite of 25 users Image was submitted by heffo
Copy and paste the code below to put this picture on your page!
Please login or register to rate the image, post a comment or add a tag.
jaredcheeda Posted at May 1, 2009, 1:26 am reverend: actually if you're familiar with advanced techniques in photoshop and know what those filters/adjustments can do, you can pretty easily pull this off by following the formula above. However the numbers are all way off, you'll need to adjust as you go for each individual image. Also, this technique can only be done in CS3 and CS4 as all previous versions did not have the Infrared option built in which this tutorial hinges on. Don't bother trying it on a girl wearing a bra or on a photo that didn't use the flash, it's pointless. higher rez is better, if you're using a digital camera and the image hasn't been horribly compressed, you'll have better luck. if it's a cheap camera or one from a phone/webcam, it won't work. If you've got a RAW image with 16 or 32 bits rather than just 8 then you're golden.
reverend Posted at April 23, 2009, 8:06 pm Imabana: it won't work in CS3 and above because it doesn't work at all. Anyone with a basic understanding of what these filters actually do could tell you that. The point of saying you need an old version is to waste more of your time.
ralfothegreat1 Posted at April 23, 2009, 1:36 pm FUKKEN SAVED
Feuchtwanger Posted at April 23, 2009, 9:08 am Photoshop is for shooping stuff. That means nou can paste a hot boob on that chick, instead of revealing a disintegrating piece of anatomy that she calls boob.
StJude1 Posted at April 23, 2009, 3:05 am "enjoy and STAY SAFE!"
shooping is clearly dangerous work
Imabanana Posted at April 22, 2009, 7:34 pm Why wouldnt this work on CS3 or above?
Feuchtwanger Posted at April 22, 2009, 12:54 pm Total bullshit.
feels_good_man Posted at April 22, 2009, 9:11 am imagine going to all that trouble just to see that shriveled raisin of a nipple. Was it worth it?
Spoonman Posted at April 22, 2009, 7:42 am is this cp? that bitch has braces
reverend: actually if you're familiar with
advanced techniques in photoshop and know
what those filters/adjustments can do, you
can pretty easily pull this off by following
the formula above. However the numbers are
all way off, you'll need to adjust as you go
for each individual image. Also, this
technique can only be done in CS3 and CS4 as
all previous versions did not have the
Infrared option built in which this tutorial
hinges on. Don't bother trying it on a girl
wearing a bra or on a photo that didn't use
the flash, it's pointless. higher rez is
better, if you're using a digital camera and
the image hasn't been horribly compressed,
you'll have better luck. if it's a cheap
camera or one from a phone/webcam, it won't
work. If you've got a RAW image with 16 or 32
bits rather than just 8 then you're golden.
Imabana: it won't work in CS3 and above
because it doesn't work at all. Anyone with a
basic understanding of what these filters
actually do could tell you that. The point of
saying you need an old version is to waste
more of your time.
FUKKEN SAVED
Photoshop is for shooping stuff. That means
nou can paste a hot boob on that chick,
instead of revealing a disintegrating piece
of anatomy that she calls boob.
"enjoy and STAY SAFE!" shooping is clearly
dangerous work
Why wouldnt this work on CS3 or above?
Total bullshit.
imagine going to all that trouble just to see
that shriveled raisin of a nipple. Was it
worth it?
is this cp? that bitch has braces
ಠ_ಠ